Google “B2B buyer journey” and you’ll see a bunch of frameworks that show a linear progression. It’s usually some variation of awareness, consideration, and decision, with one buyer moving cleanly from step to step.
But the reality of B2B buyer journeys is messier, longer, and driven by a cast of a dozen or more people whose priorities rarely align on the same timeline. Building your GTM strategy around the linear model is where the expensive mistakes get made.
Dreamdata's 2025 B2B go-to-market benchmarks found the average B2B customer journey spans 211 days and 76 touchpoints, across a buying committee that now averages 5+ stakeholders.
That's a buying ecosystem, not a funnel, and your strategy needs to match that reality.
The B2B buyer's journey is the end-to-end process a person goes through when identifying a problem, evaluating solutions, making a purchase decision, and the post-purchase phase.
That sounds great because it lets you simplify a process that’s actually a lot messier. But it causes marketers to build their GTM strategy around the assumption that B2B buyers follow a path that looks something like this:

Sam, a Chief Marketing Officer, realizes his team spends three days pulling reports from six different tools to complete monthly reporting.
There's got to be a way to use fewer tools, speed up reporting, and gain a more complete picture of performance, right?
Sam starts researching marketing platforms to see what's out there and compare features against his existing tech stack. He asks his network on LinkedIn and checks out reviews on G2.
He's narrowed down his options.
Sam signs up for a product demo with a sales rep. He's sold by their pitch and makes the budget request to his boss.
Budget in hand, Sam signs on the dotted line.
Sam and his team fly through implementation and love the product. Over time, they expand their plan.
Sounds great. Sam's buying journey was predictable, linear, and quick.
But you and I both know that’s not how it goes.
The B2B buying journey is rife with indecision, too many stakeholders, budget chokeholds, and intense competition. It's anything but simple and linear.
Your GTM strategy needs to reflect buyers' reality, meet them at key moments, and influence their decisions.
So let's look at what Sam's buying journey actually looked like:
And so it goes.
Sam's journey is unwieldy; his urgency ebbs and flows with dozens of variables competing for his time.
He'll inch forward, then double back to answer questions, gather proof points, or understand competitive options. He'll have to make the case to his boss and sell internal team members on this new purchase.
Far from a straight line, Sam’s journey looks a lot more like this:

Influ2's B2B Enterprise Buying Journey Survey reinforces this.
When we asked enterprise software buyers what most often slows down a purchase decision, the top two answers were budget approval and getting internal alignment.

None of those are problems a linear funnel model solves for. They're problems of timing, consensus, and organizational dynamics.
Research also shows that 81% of B2B buyers already have a preferred vendor by the time they first make contact with sales, per Forrester’s State of B2B Buying report.
And our own data found that 74% of enterprise software buyers are evaluating 3-5 vendors at the same time.

That means the buying decision is being shaped long before a demo gets booked.
If your GTM strategy isn't built for this non-linear journey, you can't influence your buyers in meaningful ways.
So, how do you adapt sales and marketing processes, tools, and strategies to reflect real life rather than a fairy tale?
B2B buyers spend the majority of their journey self-educating long before they reach out to a salesperson.
Gartner found that when B2B buyers are considering a purchase, they spend only 17% of that time meeting with potential suppliers, and even less (5-6%) when comparing multiple suppliers. And 75% prefer rep-free experiences altogether.
On top of this, more of the buying journey now happens in the Dark Funnel. The places you can't easily track, like
Research suggests roughly 70% of the B2B buying journey happens in these invisible channels before any vendor contact form is filled.
Katya Tarapovskaia, co-founder and Head of AI & Marketing Solutions at YouStellar, has adapted her content strategy around this reality.
She over-indexes on what she calls "steal-able" content: opinionated, practitioner-specific thought leadership that survives being ripped out of context and dropped into a DM. "If a piece needs the surrounding article to make sense," she says, "it dies in the dark funnel."
The dark funnel taught me that influence and trackability are two different things, and most of us were optimising for the wrong one.
Ultimately, sales reps have smaller windows to impact buying decisions. By the time a meeting's set, the buyer's mind is close to made up through self-serve research and internal conversations.
Here’s how to support self-serve research:
Your content should help different job roles answer questions, compare solutions, understand features, address implementation concerns, and visualize the valuable outcomes they’ll achieve.
For example, Chief Marketing Officer Sam wants to understand:
But, Sam’s Senior Marketing Manager Beth? She’s wondering:
Blog posts, case studies, videos, interviews, ROI calculators, trend reports, and more help Sam and his team find information that matters most to their roles and buying considerations.
It seems like a lot, but speed up content creation by repurposing a larger initiative – like a report, interview, or webinar – into smaller pieces (like a blog post or social carousel).
Then, further tailor content pieces to each persona to deliver helpful resources across the buying committee.
Engagement-based ad journeys serve highly personalized content to a targeted contact, and then shift future messaging based on how that person interacts.
Here’s what an engagement-based ad journey might look like for Sam:

Engagement-based ad sequences help you capitalize on moments of heightened activity by serving advanced content or, change messaging when activity ebbs – reflecting a realistic buyer journey, with all its ups and downs.
If you want to learn more about how our team uses engagement signals across multi-month buyer journeys, check out our ABM Framework.
Like a breadcrumb trail, review combinations of data points to figure out buyers’ challenges, interests, and urgency.
Focus on who’s engaging, what they’re engaging with, and when that engagement is happening to effectively time outreach and personalize conversations.
Examples of high-intent re-engagement signals to watch for:

Katya Tarapovskaia describes the cluster signal her team trusts most:
A single contact re-reading a blog is curiosity. Three people from the same company, including someone who's never touched us before, hitting bottom-of-funnel pages in the same week? That's a buying committee reconvening and building a broader business case.
The pattern she watches for is recency, concentration, and a new face in the cluster. An isolated signal can be noise, but a cluster from the same account means the internal clock just started ticking again.
These re-engagement signals suggest your buyer is busy doing self-serve research and that internal conversations are happening at the company.
Here’s Tarapovskaia's approach to accounts that go quiet. Her team doesn't pause the program but shifts from what she calls "activation mode" to "ambient visibility," widening outreach to secondary personas (IT, finance, ops) to find where the deal has actually stalled.
We also love this advice from Amanda Hunter, Marketing & ABM Strategist at Amanda In Motion, on prioritizing engagement signals.
In enterprise B2B sales, you’re never selling to just one person. You need to win over the entire buying committee (e.g., the boss, end-users, IT, and finance).
Buying committees are only getting larger, at a time when everyone is scrutinizing budgets. The result is longer sales cycles, rife with indecision. Gaining consensus is the most challenging stage.

Influ2's B2B Enterprise Buying Journey Survey found that enterprise buyers consistently flag internal alignment, not just budget, as their biggest obstacle. One senior learning and development leader at a large enterprise put it directly: "In large companies it's about matching the values and procedures of that company and influencing broadly. Literally one person can sink a ship."
Emily Yorke-Goldney, Director of Global ABM at Clarify, pointed out the core failure point in how most organizations handle this:
We've become very good at identifying intent and very poor at operationalizing it. Most organizations can tell you which individual engaged with content, but far fewer can tell you whether a buying group is forming.
Her framing for the fix is to shift from lead scoring to buying group activation, asking not just who engaged but whether multiple stakeholders are moving together, and what that signals about where the deal actually stands.
You're going to need to understand the makeup of the buying committee and each role's biggest challenges, turn-offs, and goals. Arm yourself with success stories, proof points, rebuttals, and examples to answer each person's questions and personalize your pitch.
Tarapovskaia frames her own typical enterprise committee as a three-way triangle. The CMO or VP who owns the vision, the Head of Demand Gen or ABM Manager who will own implementation, and the RevOps or IT stakeholder who controls the stack. Each is afraid of something different: the CMO wants outcome and peer proof, the implementation lead wants product depth and practicality, and IT wants integration answers and security assurance.
The mistake that loses deals is sending the CMO's strategic narrative to the IT evaluator, which reads as fluff, and you lose the veto-holder before the deal ever surfaces.
Here’s how to sell across buying committees:
Deals are 37% more likely to close when more than one contact is engaged, and cross-department threading has the potential to increase win rates by 56%.
Makes sense, right: if sales, marketing, and IT are all making the case for a new solution, it’s going to be an easier sell to leadership.
Use these tactics to take a multi-threaded outreach approach:
A huge benefit to multi-threading is your deal doesn’t die if your Champion leaves or gets busy. You have multiple relationships to lean on, build internal buy-in, and continue to advance momentum across the account.
Sales decisions happen when you're not in the room.
If your Champion isn’t armed with the right information, they may struggle to advocate for your solution.
First, map out the buying committee – who makes the decisions, what roadblocks they face, and what they care about most.
Keep in mind that people who object and slow down the journey aren’t always the ones who make the final decision. You need to address both.

Then, equip your Champion with resources to answer questions and address hesitations:
Think about the materials you lean on most throughout a sales journey and package them up for your Champion, so they don’t need to work harder to guide the sales conversation.
Don't just throw a bunch of materials over the fence. Make sure your champion knows how to use each piece and when, encouraging them to pull you into any conversations to offer support.
Tarapovskaia suggests treating the buying committee like a micro-ABM program within the account. Each persona gets their own content track, journey, and angle, so no one is a stranger when the vote happens.
Most tools still reflect the linear buying journey and work at the account level, which means you're not getting reliable data to truly understand each buyer as they crisscross through the decision-making process.
As a result, you end up triggering content and campaigns based on unreliable data, making it nearly impossible to target opportune moments in the buyers’ journey.
Thankfully, MarTech has come a long way. To get better insights into where buyers are in the journey and orchestrate your GTM program around individual behavior, look for tools that:
One of the biggest mistakes you can make is treating an entire account as if it were one person. Buying decisions are made by a group of people, so you need a holistic view of what each person is doing and how your program influences them.
This holistic view helps:
Influ2 is a contact-level ABM platform that gives this holistic view across the buying committee. For example, you can see:
This replaces the idea of buying committees as faceless lists of roles and pain points, and shows how your program influences the buying journeys.
Knowing where a buyer is in their journey is one thing. Taking the right action based on that information is what actually makes it valuable. Like Tarapovskaia told us, "A signal sitting in a dashboard is a signal that doesn't exist."
Influ2 makes it easier to act on your signals by orchestrating at the contact level.
B2B buyers are people. And people move at their own pace, get influenced by shifting priorities, have internal debates, and go through countless digital touchpoints. They’re busy, conflicted, and risk-averse.
The B2B buyer's journey isn't simple and tidy, and the linear model is little more than useful fiction.
By adapting your GTM strategy, you can meet buyers exactly where they are and guide decisions.
With Influ2, you can do this for every contact or zoom out to see the big picture of the entire buying committee. That's what a GTM strategy built for the real B2B buyer journey looks like.
The traditional B2B buyer's journey has three stages: awareness (the buyer recognizes a problem), consideration (the buyer evaluates solutions), and decision (the buyer selects a vendor). In practice, enterprise buyers loop through these stages multiple times over months, with different stakeholders entering and exiting at different points. The journey rarely ends at purchase either; post-sale expansion and renewal are increasingly treated as their own buying cycles.
Dreamdata's 2025 benchmarks put the average B2B customer journey at 211 days and 76 touchpoints. Enterprise deals run significantly longer, particularly when security reviews, legal, procurement, and executive sign-off are all required. The key implication for marketing: consistent presence throughout the journey matters more than heavy investment at any single stage.
The dark funnel refers to the portion of the B2B buying journey that happens in places you can't track: private Slack groups, internal meetings, peer conversations on LinkedIn, AI assistant queries, community forums, and industry podcasts. Research suggests roughly 70% of the buying journey happens in these channels before a buyer ever fills out a form. Strategies that only account for trackable intent signals are missing most of the actual decision-making process.
Start with content that addresses the buyer's problem before they're ready to talk to sales: educational blog posts, peer interviews, ROI calculators, and comparison resources. Run consistent contact-level advertising to stay visible to specific decision-makers at your target accounts, even during quiet periods. And monitor re-engagement signals (ad clicks, content binge-reading, return website visits) to identify when a buyer's urgency is picking back up, so sales can time outreach to match the buyer's actual readiness rather than an arbitrary pipeline stage.
Dominique Jackson is a Content Marketer Manager at Influ2. Over the past 10 years, he has worked with startups and enterprise B2B SaaS companies to boost pipeline and revenue through strategic content initiatives.